|
|
Post by jeffm928 on Mar 7, 2006 0:38:19 GMT -5
I know this is similar to a recent post.. but instead of weighing Vienna and Venice, I'm weighing Venice vs. Florence..
We have 4-5 days to spend in Northern Italy before heading down to Rome, would people suggest staying in Florence (with a possible day trip to Lucca) or visiting Venice, or some combination of both?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Post by bubbletoes on Mar 7, 2006 3:11:45 GMT -5
With only that amount of time you really wouldn't be able to do both because they are quite far from each other. Personally i think Venice would be worth it because it is so different from all the other places i went in Europe. It's an absoloutely beautiful city. but then again. so is florence. But it really depends on what your looking for.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jules80 on Mar 7, 2006 10:22:00 GMT -5
if you have 5 days, 2 in in venice and 3 in florence. its about a 3 hour train ride i beleive. venice is amazing but i don't think you need 5 whole days there. florence is also fantastic. there's a lot to see and 3 days is a good amount of time to cover it all. if you have only 4 days i'd probably stay in florence and do day trips... there's just more to see there. but i love venice.
jules
|
|
