dmic2
Junior Travel Member
Posts: 7
|
Post by dmic2 on Apr 3, 2007 0:17:37 GMT -5
i have an REI travel pack, about 65 L, but i am not that fond of it, not to comfortable. I know the osprey packs are pretty nice but expensive. The Porter packs that they have are about 60 and 90 L. Anyone use these before or hear anything? Also, i will be in europe for about 3 weeks, thats plenty big enough right?
|
|
|
Post by Eagle on Apr 3, 2007 12:57:12 GMT -5
dmic2, the Osprey Packs are excellent quality, and I'm sure would be more than adequate for your trip. However, a several points to consider. First, whichever pack you use, whether REI, Osprey or whatever MUST be properly fitted according to your torso length. Any competent shop should be able to measure this for you. That could be one reason why your presnt pack is not too comfortable? It's also a good idea to give some thought to whether you will prefer travelling with a top loading pack (such as most of the Osprey models) or a panel loading model (ie: with zippers, as most of the Eagle Creek packs). IMO the panel loaders are easier to travel with, especially this provides a means for both easier access (no need to pull everything out of the pack to get something on the bottom) as well as a minimal amount of security (the zippers can be locked). Some other things to think about are whether you want a detachable Daypack (works great for carry-on) and a stowable harness system (harness fits behind a zippered panel during air travel, so that straps aren't torn off by airport conveyor systems). Some airlines will "saran wrap" the straps to help in this regard, but if the pack isn't wrapped, you might find a nasty surprise when you remove it from the baggage carousel! I wasn't sure whether you were referring to the 60L or the 90L with your question "that's plenty big enough, right" My general "rule of thumb" for packing is to pack the same for three weeks as for three months. I'm always looking for ways to pack lighter, so would likely NOT be travelling with a 90L pack! I'm using a 2003-vintage EC Continental Journey at the moment, which is about 65L with the detachable Daypack, and find that's been quite adequate so far (although it was kind of "bulging at the seams" on my last trip). I couldn't tell from your profile where you're located, but if there's an REI store in the vicinity have a look at the EC models and some of the other packs they stock. Good luck!!!
|
|
dmic2
Junior Travel Member
Posts: 7
|
Post by dmic2 on Apr 4, 2007 0:12:43 GMT -5
I have also been looking at the newer model (grand voyage?) of EC packs, basically the same one you spoke of. Are you able to carry that bag on flights? it looks like it could make it, but what sort of luck have you had?
|
|
|
Post by Eagle on Apr 6, 2007 10:17:33 GMT -5
dmic2, my EC Pack is supposedly "carry-on size" with the Daypack detached, but I can tell you from personal experience that it is NOT permitted as such with any of the airlines I've travelled with (either due to it's size or weight). I have to agree with this, as it's simply too large to fit either in the overhead bins or under the seat. IMO, I think EC should revise their assessment of which of their Packs can be used in this way. The Daypack works well for carry-on though.
Many airlines lately are tightening up their baggage limits, both due to fuel costs and space limits (especially the budget airlines in Europe!). Unless you're a "minimalist" traveller that can get by with a 40L. Pack, it's probably realistic to assume that you'll be checking your main Pack.
Happy travels!!!
|
|